That's not true. You just didn't read political books well. Democracy is a procedure. If the society is not able to influence the quality of this procedure sometimes, it does not say badly about democracy itself, it says that the elite has deviated from these principles, and the society has not insisted on observing the principles. But this is not an illusion.
Everything happens behind closed doors. And all have the same goal, just playing theatre in front of your face. Even before the result of the referendum I said that the UK will never leave the EU. This is not how the freemasonic satanic world organisation runs.
In the last Foundation elections I could be a president if I invested 75k and persuaded 150 people to sacrifice 10 minutes of their time to sign up. Rumor has it that one candidate nearly managed to do it. NEM's democracy system is POI (POS+). Blockchain rules can work only within blockchain.
But you didn't invest money. And you didn't invite people. In Russia says "almost non count". Therefore, don't offer this rhetorical story as an alternative, which it’s something means . There were elections, Tinsman won.
I don't think the voting was legit. 200 and some reg. Nembers aren't exactly what I call a legit election. Also some pretty shitty attacks and talks have been made along that process. But we'll we have what we deserve I think.
i bet foundation will change ruleset before next voting starts to something thats better more transparent. it dont make much sense discuss about the past that it was not the best possible way done is true but in my opinion still the best possible candidate did win